During one of the math centers the kindergarten students were exploring
the concepts of “lighter” and “heavier” by using a balance scale and various
objects. Below is the transcription of a conversation between two children who
were trying to find out “Which is lighter, 1 domino or 3 pencil-top erasers?”
Child A: “It’s my turn to put things in the scale!”
Child B: “I know. Three erasers are heavier because 3 is way more than
1.”
Child A: “Yeah but dominoes are really hard so they’re probly real heavy
too.”
Child B: “It doesn’t matter about hardness, how many only matters.”
Child A put the 3 erasers in one side, and the domino into the other
side of the balance scale.
Child A: “Yeah! The hard domino went down so erasers really are harder!”
Child B: “Yeah erasers are lighter because they’re higher in the air
even though there’s three. Weird!”
Both of the children understand that when using a balance scale, the
lighter objects with rise, and the heavier objects will lower. However, both of
the children also have some misconceptions on what makes objects heavier or
lighter. Child A was convinced that they “hardness” of an object always affect
its weight. Setting up an experience where this child could explore weighing a
softer object such as play dough and a harder object such as a pen, the child
would be able to explore and understand that how hard or soft an object is, may
not always determine how heavy it is. Child B has the misconception that more
of an object will always make it heavier than a lower quantity of another object.
Allowing this child to weigh 5 feathers and 1 quarter would show him that the 5
feathers are lighter than the single coin. Setting up exploratory experiences
like these, along with discussions as the children explore, would create
meaningful experiences to help them further develop concepts of weight, while
decreasing their misconceptions and current misunderstandings.
This is an excellent analysis here in terms of thinking about the big idea, the different ways of thinking about the big idea, and ways to advance the students' understanding through a new task. Think now even more specifically about how you might set up this next task...specifically, how might you try to scaffold or sequence the student responses / approaches to this task in order to generate a meaningful classroom discussion that leads students towards thinking about this big idea (i.e., the relation between "heaviness", "size", and "weight")
ReplyDelete