The learning goal of this task is for students to understand
order of operations and to be able to work backwards and opposite form a
starting number. This activity falls under the common core standard of 2.NBT.7-
“add and subtract within 1000, using concrete models of drawings and strategies
based on place value, properties of operations, and/or the relationship between
addition and subtraction; relate the strategy to a written method.” The big
idea is to get students to understand that given a starting number the problem
may need to be worked on backwards and how and what strategies to do that
involve addition or subtraction. This task is a high-level task in that it
encourages the students to elicit their thinking through the use of adding or
subtracting backwards or having to rearrange by if it asks to add they will be
challenged to realize its really making them do the opposite and subtract.
There are many ways to go about solving this problem. One
way to solve this would be to start at the number that is given, 139, and
notice that the arrow that is dotted is asking to add 2. So then I would add 2
to 139 and get 141 to go in the next bubble. I would then see that the arrow
from 141 to the next circle is asking to subtract 10 so I would subtract 10 from
141 and get 131. Then go back to the number 139 and see that the arrow from the
circle next to it to the 139 circle says to add 10. I would realize that since
it’s not asking to subtract 10 from 139 but really add 10 to 139 so I would get
149. I would check my work to see that 149-10=139 and that is correct. Another
way to go about this problem could be start at 139 and fill in all the empty
circles before it then proceed to do the last two circles, basically just start
at different positions.
I anticipated the students to solve the problem using the
ways I provided above. Although I anticipated multiple errors to occur in the
process. Some of the errors include: the students would put either +2 or -10 in
the circles given the correct arrow and not actually solve for the problem.
Another error is I could see the students being able to work forwards starting
at 139 then adding 2 then subtracting 10 and getting those last two circles
correct but not being able to work backwards and do the opposite of what is being
asked. I could see the students getting very confused at this problem.
I am just using this students work to show the problem but I
did not specifically tune in on them. I observed all the students working on
this problem and every single student had problems with solving it so there are
technically no steps taken by any specific student. Once I saw the whole class
struggling I told them to skip the problem and finish the work page and we will
go over it as a class. So I will explain the steps I took to show the students
how to solve this problem.
- I said let’s start at the number 139. I asked what arrow was leading to the next circle and pointed. The class responded with a +2 arrow. I then asked so what should we do to 139? They responded with add 2 so I asked them to add 2 and got 141.
- I continued on and asked what arrow was leading to the next circle and they responded with minus 10 from 141 and you get 131. This shows me that they understood this part.
- Now was the tricky part that the majority of the students struggled with. I said to go back to the starting number the book gave us, 139. I said what arrow is from the circle before it to the circle with 139 in it. They said minus 10. I then asked ok so do we minus 10? And the majority said yes. This is when I caught them and explained if it asks us to work backwards from a number we actually do the opposite and add 10. So we add 10 to 139 and get what? They responded with 149. I then said let’s check our work. Does 149-10=139? They all said yes and proceeded on with the rest of the circles. The students were able to understand that we had to do the opposite and understood to check their work to see if they did it correct.
One hypothesis I have about the students current
mathematical knowledge with this specific problem is that the students may not
have been introduced to working backwards and doing the opposites with adding
and subtracting numbers. I feel the students were struggling with this problem
because they saw the arrows, they saw whether to add 2 or subtract 10 based on
the type of arrow so they did that whenever necessary but they did not
comprehend that the problem needed to be solved by working backwards and
opposite. Another hypothesis I have is that the students may not know at all
that problems such as these involve closely reading the problem and figuring
out to do the opposite. This is a higher task for them as it showed when the
majority of the class struggled with solving the problem.
One way to advance the students thinking with this task is
to set it up differently and maybe use only add 2 or minus 10. Such as: use the
arrows to show minus 2 or add 2. Using smaller numbers could help and teach
them how to solve it also say the dotted arrow is add 2 the non-dotted is minus
2 and then the students could solve it easier. Another way is that I could have
the students take a different approach to this task. The students could be
given a number and I would have them add a number to it and get that number
then subtract a number and get that number. Then have that starting number and
ask that if it asks to add 5 do the opposite. I think that if I explicitly
state to do the opposite in certain times then the students will catch on
easier and then understand what the problem is asking then have them come back
and redo the problem given in their book and see if they understand how to
solve it then.
Excellent analysis.
ReplyDeleteWhat do you think is the cognitive demand of this task? How might you increase its cognitive demand? What are the limitations of the task as is?